![]() |
||||||
Damage Control By Elizabeth Licata
And now it seems that some trees may have been cut down in haste. One poster to the listserv Buffalo Issue Alerts tells a story of forty-year-old trees being cut down on Claremont Avenue in the Elmwood Village area, with no sign-off from a professional arborist. Another tells of two blocks worth of trees being removed from Cumberland, in South Buffalo, by crews who refused to answer the questions of area residents. Is this hearsay from an Internet listserv? Yes, but a highly reputable one where real names are used, and the anguish over the lost trees seems all too verifiable. In a situation where plants that take decades to reach maturity are at stake, “cut first and ask questions later” doesn’t seem like the best of all possible strategies. There is no question that trees badly damaged by storms can be very serious hazards to power lines, buildings, cars, and, most important, people, but it is also true that once the broken limbs are removed what’s left of the tree may be more viable than it initially appears. According to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), a tree can have seventy-five percent of its live crown removed before it loses its ability to survive. Indeed, the DEC advises that “landowners should not be in a hurry to prune or remove damaged trees that are not hazardous. Pruning is best done in the dormant season [late winter].”
“What I’m concerned about is the second or third year after the storm. Severely damaged trees are not going to produce enough food if they have lost sixty percent of their crownthey will be in stress. In stress, they are more likely to be attacked by insects or disease.” Territo agrees with many contractors when he notes that “when you get up in a bucket it looks a lot worse. It might look fine from down below, but there could be twenty branches that are fractured and you need to saw them off.” The ISA-certified arborist pointed out a few factors that may have saved many trees, including the fact that some normally-vulnerable trees survived only because they had already lost their leaves and that trees on the east side of a building were more likely to suffer damage. Territo agrees with many observers when he sadly notes that the storm would change Western New York’s landscape for years to come. For his part, he was able to cut the list of doomed trees at Buffalo State College from 120 to 105, “just to see if we can find ways to save them. I’m experimenting with a few things.” Other garden damage Compared to the loss of our beloved trees, a few shrubs or rose bushes more or less may not seem that big of a deal, but they still represent a large portion of the damage facing area gardeners. And then there are the gazebos, trellises, and awnings lost in the overall carnage.
Some gardeners are making lemonade, using the storm as an opportunity to simplify their landscape; replacing flimsy materials with steel, stone, or concrete; or welcoming the chance to grow sun-hungry plants in a spot where trees had once made that impossible. There is no real bright side to the irreparable harm caused by October’s freak blizzard; the most we can hope for is that, come spring, the resilience of nature will prove stronger than the vicissitudes of weather. Elizabeth Licata is editor of Buffalo Spree. SUBSCRIBE NOW Back to the Table of Contents Back to Top |
||||||